| HEAD 2002 Pileup Talk | Nucleus of M81 | |||||||||||||
|
This example concerns an ACIS-S observation (obsid_735) of the
nucleus of M81 by Douglas Swartz. The nucleus appeared as an
extended object about 3 arc-minutes off-axis because it was not the
primary target of the observation.
After obtaining the best fit using isis
isis> fit_counts;
Parameters[Variable] = 7[5]
Data bins = 99
Chi-square = 120.8
Reduced chi-square = 1.285
isis> list_par;
phabs(1)*powerlaw(1)
idx param tie-to freeze value min max
1 phabs(1).nH 0 0 0.08063485 0 1
2 powerlaw(1).norm 0 0 0.006880267 0 0.1
3 powerlaw(1).PhoIndex 0 0 1.92351 0 3
4 pileup<1>.nregions 0 1 3 1 10
5 pileup<1>.g0 0 1 1 0 1
6 pileup<1>.alpha 0 0 0.4810092 0 1
7 pileup<1>.psffrac 0 0 0.9578905 0 1
As expected, the ![]() print_kernel function shows the degree of pileup:
isis> print_kernel(1); 1: 0.0241037 0.207965 2: 0.0652543 0.270813 3: 0.117772 0.235102 4: 0.159419 0.153076 5: 0.172633 0.0797342 6: 0.155786 0.03461 7: 0.1205 0.0128769 8: 0.0815551 0.0041921 9: 0.0490641 0.0012131 10: 0.0265656 0.000315941 11: 0.0130762 7.48036e-05 12: 0.00590006 1.62349e-05 13: 0.00245736 1.04828e-05 *** pileup fraction: 0.792035 This indicates that about 2.4 percent of the frames consisted of single photon events in the pileup regions, 6.5 percent were 2 photon events, etc. However, 21 percent of the observed events were single photon events, 27 percent were due to 2 photons, and so on. This gave a 79 percent pileup fraction. The following figure, produced by isis using its confidence mapping and plotting functions, shows the results of the model compared to the ASCA results of Ishisaki, et. al.. ![]()
|
This page was last updated May 31, 2002 by John E. Davis. To comment on it or the material presented here, send email to davis@space.mit.edu.
![]()