Hi Maria, can you send the code you use for rebinning and fitting in isis? I'm not 100% sure, but I know that there are some pitfalls in there that I myself fell in on the way ... Cheers, Victoria On 4/29/14 5:44 AM, María Díaz Trigo wrote: > Dear ISIS experts, > > I have realised that the chi2 value for rebinned spectra is very > different when calculated by ISIS and XSPEC. The chi2 is exactly the > same when I use non-binned spectra, so the difference must arise with > the way of calculating errors after rebinning. > > I am using the default fitting method (which seems to be the same for > XSPEC and ISIS) and rebin the HEG spectra to have a minimum of 25 > cts/bin. Before rebinning, a simple power law fit gives me a chi2 of > 838.37 for 2362 dof both in ISIS and XSPEC. After rebinning, I get: > > XSPEC: Chi2 of 217.90 (460) > ISIS: Chi2 of 420.46 (460) > > So the difference is almost a factor of two, and the parameters of the > fit are also different. > > Do you know why am I getting such a difference? > > Best, > > Maria > ---- You received this message because you are subscribed to the isis-users list. To unsubscribe, send a message to isis-users-request_at_email.domain.hiddenwith the first line of the message as: unsubscribeReceived on Tue Apr 29 2014 - 10:53:02 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu May 01 2014 - 08:23:53 EDT