Craig Heinke <cheinke_at_email.domain.hidden>That's something to think about. I'm finding that each additional parameter I >let float increases the fitting time substantially, so I'm looking for >parameters I can fix without a great impact on the fits. In my case I'm >dealing with pileup of under 10%, and extracted counts in a 4 pixel radius >around an on-axis point source. Most of my pileup will be in the 2-photon >case, due to the low count rates, leading to (to first order) one Does "print_kernel (1);" produce results that are consistent with your expectations? >energy-shifted spectrum of piled photons. Two variable parameters determine >its normalization--the alpha parameter and the psffrac parameter. As the >science doesn't actually depend on either of those values directly, it seems >to me (correct me if I'm wrong) that allowing only alpha to vary will still >correctly normalize the first-order pileup. So even if psffrac is between 0.9 What values for alpha are you seeing? >and 0.95, I shouldn't go too far wrong in my spectral fits in freezing it if I >let alpha vary. How do you parameters and alpha change when you use psffrac=0.92 instead of 0.95? Thanks, --John ---- You received this message because you are subscribed to the isis-users list. To unsubscribe, send a message to isis-users-request_at_email.domain.hiddenwith the first line of the message as: unsubscribeReceived on Tue Apr 30 2002 - 08:16:30 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Mar 15 2007 - 08:45:50 EDT