To: Dan Dewey
Cc: lpd@head-cfa.harvard.edu, belinda@head-cfa.harvard.edu Subject: Re: HRMA areas In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 21 Oct 1997 12:25:44 EDT." <199710211625.MAA19112@spectra.mit.edu> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 12:43:10 -0400 From: Ping Zhao Status: R Content-Length: 2249 Hi, Dan: Yes, I produced the following file. It is the current best raytracing results for the 2pi effective area. It does include the 12 supporting struts obstruction and CAP and all the pre- and post- collimators and apertures. NO MORE vigneeting factors need to apply. We are still trying to close the gap between the model and the data. THere are still a few percent difference. So these numbers may change accordingly. But Fred said this is good enough for the observer's guide. Thanks, Ping > Ping, Larry, > > I believe you created a file which begins with: > > 0.01000 386.5537 255.2093 199.7004 106.9064 948.3429 > 0.01016 386.5434 255.2037 199.6965 106.9047 948.3214 > 0.01033 386.5332 255.1982 199.6926 106.9031 948.3002 > 0.01049 386.5233 255.1928 199.6888 106.9015 948.2795 > and ends with > 29.05260 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0003 > 29.52250 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0002 > 30.00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0002 > and has in the middle > 0.98378 308.9288 213.5945 170.7672 95.1800 788.4705 > 0.99970 308.9532 213.6302 170.7907 95.1923 788.5663 > 1.01586 308.9893 213.6721 170.8192 95.2067 788.6871 > 1.03229 309.1009 213.7553 170.8776 95.2334 788.9670 > > > This data file is as far as I know the first/only/best release of > the HRMA areas on a fine energy grid from MST (using synchrtron above > 2 keV for example). > > In the past Leon would produce effective areas and add that a > vigneeting factor of order 0.9 should be applied to account for > the CAP struts etc. (Likewise if a geometrical mirror model > is used the 0.9 or whtever must be included for thsi vignetting). > SO, a factor of 0.9 is being applied to this current file > you have issued - SHOULD any factor be applied? > > As for the "35 mm" - I added that as a way of saying this > is the effective area into 2pi? What aperture is it the effective > area for? > > THANKS - I'd like to get all these fine points ironed > out before we load much of these data into the ASC archive, > > -Dan >