To: Dan Dewey
Cc: lpd@head-cfa.harvard.edu, belinda@head-cfa.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: HRMA areas
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 21 Oct 1997 12:25:44 EDT."
<199710211625.MAA19112@spectra.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 12:43:10 -0400
From: Ping Zhao
Status: R
Content-Length: 2249
Hi, Dan:
Yes, I produced the following file. It is the current best raytracing
results for the 2pi effective area. It does include the 12 supporting
struts obstruction and CAP and all the pre- and post- collimators and
apertures. NO MORE vigneeting factors need to apply.
We are still trying to close the gap between the model and the data.
THere are still a few percent difference. So these numbers may change
accordingly. But Fred said this is good enough for the observer's
guide.
Thanks,
Ping
> Ping, Larry,
>
> I believe you created a file which begins with:
>
> 0.01000 386.5537 255.2093 199.7004 106.9064 948.3429
> 0.01016 386.5434 255.2037 199.6965 106.9047 948.3214
> 0.01033 386.5332 255.1982 199.6926 106.9031 948.3002
> 0.01049 386.5233 255.1928 199.6888 106.9015 948.2795
> and ends with
> 29.05260 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0003
> 29.52250 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0002
> 30.00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0002
> and has in the middle
> 0.98378 308.9288 213.5945 170.7672 95.1800 788.4705
> 0.99970 308.9532 213.6302 170.7907 95.1923 788.5663
> 1.01586 308.9893 213.6721 170.8192 95.2067 788.6871
> 1.03229 309.1009 213.7553 170.8776 95.2334 788.9670
>
>
> This data file is as far as I know the first/only/best release of
> the HRMA areas on a fine energy grid from MST (using synchrtron above
> 2 keV for example).
>
> In the past Leon would produce effective areas and add that a
> vigneeting factor of order 0.9 should be applied to account for
> the CAP struts etc. (Likewise if a geometrical mirror model
> is used the 0.9 or whtever must be included for thsi vignetting).
> SO, a factor of 0.9 is being applied to this current file
> you have issued - SHOULD any factor be applied?
>
> As for the "35 mm" - I added that as a way of saying this
> is the effective area into 2pi? What aperture is it the effective
> area for?
>
> THANKS - I'd like to get all these fine points ironed
> out before we load much of these data into the ASC archive,
>
> -Dan
>