Hi John, On 4/13/12 7:27 AM, John Houck wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 19:11 -0400, Maurice Leutenegger wrote: > >> I would prefer to allow model evaluation even if the derived >> parameter falls outside the soft limit. >> > Why not just enlarge the allowed range for the derived parameter? > > I think this is what I will have to do. I am modifying code written by a colleague who is unable to continue to support it. His code was written before the behavior of set_par_fun was modified, which is why this "bug" wasn't caught before. It would have been easier if there were a flag to relax (soft) bound checking for derived parameters, but I can figure out how to change the parameter limits. Thanks, Maurice ---- You received this message because you are subscribed to the isis-users list. To unsubscribe, send a message to isis-users-request_at_email.domain.hiddenwith the first line of the message as: unsubscribeReceived on Fri Apr 13 2012 - 13:10:14 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Aug 23 2012 - 08:51:52 EDT