(no subject)

From: <"'houck_at_email.domain.hidden>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:04:09 -0400
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 16:51 -0400, Gagne, Marc wrote:
> Just to follow up on my last message, it appears as though the
> gauss[1].sigma parameter is actually sigma/2.3548.  I.e., could that factor
> have been incorrectly applied in the code?  Thanks.
> 

I don't think so -- that factor doesn't appear anywhere in the
ISIS source code.

(Well, it does appear trivially in the logic used to compute
initial parameter values using cursor positions read off of a
screen plot -- but it does not appear in the function evaluating
and fitting code at all).

 -- John
 

----
You received this message because you are
subscribed to the isis-users list.
To unsubscribe, send a message to
isis-users-request_at_email.domain.hiddenwith the first line of the message as:
unsubscribe
Received on Thu Jun 21 2001 - 17:04:13 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Mar 15 2007 - 08:45:50 EDT