Background:
Great efforts are currently being channeled into ground- and balloon-based
CMB experiments, mainly to explore polarization and anisotropy on small angular scales.
To optimize instrumental design and assess experimental prospects, it is important
to understand in detail the atmosphere-related systematic errors that
limit the science achievable with new instruments.
For this purpose, we spatially compare the 648 square degree ground- and
balloon-based QMASK map with the atmosphere-free WMAP map, finding beautiful
agreement on all angular scales where both are sensitive.
This is a reassuring quantitative assessment of the power of the
state-of-the-art FFT- and matrix-based mapmaking techniques that have been
used for QMASK and virtually all subsequent experiments.
For the QMASK data and covariance matrix please go to the
QMASK Home Page.
We measure the cosmic microwave background (CMB) power
spectrum on angular scales l~30-200 (1-6 degrees) from
the QMASK map, which combines the data from the QMAP and
Saskatoon experiments. Since the accuracy of recent
measurements leftward of the first acoustic peak is
limited by sample-variance, the large area of the
QMASK map (648 square degrees) allows us to place
among the sharpest constraints to date in this range,
in good agreement with BOOMERanG and (on the largest
scales) COBE/DMR. By band-pass-filtering the QMAP and
Saskatoon maps, we are able to spatially compare them
scale-by-scale to check for beam- and pointing-related
systematic errors.
For more details please go to the
QMASK Home Page.
We present a method for comparing and combining maps with
different resolutions and beam shapes, and apply it to the
Saskatoon, QMAP and COBE/DMR data sets. Although the
Saskatoon and QMAP maps detect signal at the 21 sigma and
40 sigma levels, respectively, their difference is consistent
with pure noise, placing strong limits on possible systematic
errors. In particular, we obtain quantitative upper limits
on relative calibration and pointing errors. Splitting the
combined data by frequency shows similar consistency between
the Ka- and Q-bands, placing limits on foreground contamination.
The visual agreement between the maps is equally striking.
Our combined QMAP+Saskatoon map, nicknamed QMASK, is
publicly available at www.hep.upenn.edu/~xuyz/qmask.html
together with its 6495x6495 noise covariance matrix. This
thoroughly tested data set covers a large enough area
(648 square degrees - currently the largest degree-scale
map available) to allow a statistical comparison with
COBE/DMR, showing good agreement.
For more details please go to the
QMASK Home Page.
We present results from the
QMAP
balloon experiment, which maps the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB)
and probes its angular power spectrum on degree scales.
In two separate flights, data were taken in six channels at two
frequency bands between 26 to 46 GHz. We describe our method for mapmaking
(removal of 1/f-noise and scan-synchronous offsets) and power spectrum
estimation, as well as the results of a joint analysis of the data from
both flights. This produces a 527 square degree map of the CMB around
the North Celestial Pole, allowing a wide variety of systematic cross-checks.
The frequency dependence of the fluctuations is consistent with CMB and
inconsistent with Galactic foreground emission. The anisotropy is measured
in three multipole bands from l~40 to l~200, and the angular power spectrum
shows a distinct rise which is consistent with the Saskatoon results.
Details about this map-making process, as well as, the power spectrum
extraction can be found in
de Oliveira-Costa et al.(1998).
We present Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) maps from the Santa
Barbara HACME balloon experiment (Staren etal 1997), covering about
1150 square degrees split between two regions in the northern sky, near the
stars gamma Ursae Minoris and alpha Leonis, respectively. The angular
resolution FWHM of the beam is ~0.77 degrees in three frequency bands
centered on 39, 41 and 43 GHz. The results demonstrate that the
thoroughly interconnected scan strategy employed allows efficient
removal of 1/f-noise. The maps display no striping, and the noise
correlations are found to be virtually isotropic, decaying on an angular
scale ~1 degree. The signal-to-noise ratio in the map is of order 0.5 and
some individual hot and cold spots are significant at the 1 sigma-level,
with many spatial features being consistent between the three channels.
The results bode well for the planned follow-up experiments BEAST and
ACE, since they show that even with the overly cautious assumption that
1/f-noise will be as dominant as for HACME, the problem it poses can be
readily overcome with the mapmaking algorithm discussed.
Details about this map-making process can be found in
Tegmark et al.(1997).
Wiener filtering is a general method for estimating a signal
from noise data.
We made a Wiener-filtered map of the CMB fluctuations in a cap
with 15 degrees of diameter, centered in the North Celestial Pole (NCP).
The map was based on the 1993-1995 data from the
Saskatoon
experiment, with an angular resolution around 1 degree in
the frequency range of 30-40 GHz. The signal-to-noise ratio in the
map was the order of 2, and some individual hot and cold spots are
significant at the 5 sigma level. The spatial features are found to
be consistent from year to year, which reinforces the conclusion
that Saskatoon results are not dominated by residual atmospheric
contamination or other non-celestial signals. Details about this
map-making process can be found in
Tegmark et al. (1997).
The 3 first pannels show maps gerated from the subsets of data that
were taken in 1993, 1994 and 1995, respectively. The 1993 data seems
to be rather featureless, reflecting the fact that the 1993 data set
contains considerably less information than the other 2 years of data.
Similarly, the 1995 map is seen to contain more small-scale structure
than the 1994 map, which reflects the fact that the angular resolution
was approximately doubled in 1995. Most potencial source problems with
the experiment (as underestimation of atmospheric contamination, sidelobe
pickup from celestial bodies, etc) would be expect to vary in timescales
much shorter than 1 year. In addition, the beam patterns were quite
different in the 3 years, as described in
Netterfield et al. (1996).
The visual similarity between these independent maps therefore provides
evidence that the bulk of the signal being detected is in fact due
to temperature fluctuations on the sky rather than to unknown systematic
problems.