back: H-HAS-EA-8.008 back to Analysis Table next: H-HAS-SC-7.001
H-HAS-EA-8.009


XRCF Data (upper: all iterations) and MARX Simulation (lower: first iteration only)

Energy scan: 7.200, 7.700, 8.200, 8.700

H-HAS-EA-8.009 Notes

DCM energy scan.
Looks like CMDB defocus (15mm) is in error by x2.

The green-ish line showing up also is W line from RAS source not fully attenuated by DCM: looks like my DCM source model allows too much of this to leak through. This measurement is good for this test because the MEG will not see the "real" energies being used (7.2-8.7 keV) but will be sensitive to any 1.8 keV emmission. This same DCM modeling fault shows up in the "SC" series measurements that follow.