Fitting a Model of the F-K and O-K edges
As with PKS 2155-304 (see the C-K edge web page), I
extracted the observed count spectrum, n(E), for the Mk 421 observation
in October 2002 (obs ID 4148, from
F. Nicastro). This time, the C-K edge model was
included with the 2PL model fit gives N(E), allowing the depth of the
edge to vary using a single depth parameter. The optical depth due to
absorption is computed as -ln[n(E)/N(E)], plotted in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1: Modeling the 12-25 Å region of the Mk 421 X-ray spectrum.
The O-K edge, which is deepest near 23 Å, has a resonance feature
near 23.3 Å and a deep edge near 23.0 Å. Other narrow
features in this region are associated with the source or the
interstellar medium. The 18 Å edge is modeled using Henke optical
constants for fluorine with slight modifications.
The structure of the O-K edge is very similar to the O-K edge found in
the ACIS-S optical blocking filter. The model was taken from a spectral
decomposition of the OBF and then matched to the Henke optical constants
in the 18-21 Å region for extrapolation shortward of 18 Å.
This model has a resonance feature that shows up as a deep narrow
absorption line near 23.3 Å that is clearly detected.
The edge at 18 Å is attributed to fluorine. Fig. 2 shows that the
edge cannot be identified with redshifted Fe-L

Fig. 2: The 18 Å edge is compared to two models. The dotted line
represents possible Fe-L absorption, redshifted to z=0.025. The lines
are too narrow to fit the data. The F-K edge, however, fits very well
without shifting. F-K and Fe-L opacity data were kindly provided by Adam Hitchock of McMaster
University.
The F-K edge EXAFS was fit by a similar method used to fit the C-K
EXAFS. First, the Henke optical constants were obtained from the CXRO web site. Then, the edge was
positioned at lam_fk = 18.03 Å and the EXAFS was fit using the
form
1 + A exp( -x/dampscale ) * cos( freq * x )
where x = (lam_fk - lambda) / lam_fk. The constants of the adjustment
were estimated (chi-by-eye): A = 0.6, dampscale = 4./lam_fk, and freq =
2 ¼ lam_fk/8.5. Note the similarity of the parameters to that used in
fitting the C-K edge, where A = 0.4, dampscale = 4./lam_ck, and freq = 2
¼ lam_ck/16. The result is shown in Fig. 1. The overall fit to the Mk
421 data in the 0.22-1.0 keV region is shown in Fig. 3 and expanded in
Fig. 4. The jumps near 0.38 keV and 0.48 keV are locations of
transitions from data on both a BI and an FI chip to where there is only
data on FI chips (the 0.38-0.48 keV range) so the jumps are caused by
slight inaccuracy in the BI/FI QE correction.

Fig. 3: Fit to the observed spectrum of Mk 421, where the contaminant
absorption is included in the model so the C-K and F-K edges are
apparent. The overall fit is good to better than 3% except in the
0.38-0.48 keV region where the relative uncertainties between FI QEs and
BI QEs dominate. Below 0.25 keV, the spectrum deviates from the model
due to losses from the pulse height distribution as low pulse height
events fall below the event threshold.

Fig. 4: Counts vs. wavelength at the edges of F-K (top) and O-K
(bottom). The overall structure is modeled to better than 3% and the
only remaining
features are intrinsic to the source (or to the gas between the target
and the telescope, see Nicastro et al., 2003, in preparation).
There is a slight normalization error in the
F-K edge region due to the systematic effects of correcting for the
relative error in the BI QEs compared to the FI QEs.
Back
Herman Marshall
hermanm@space.mit.edu
Last updated August 12, 2003